<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/1.8.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Diversified Business Services</title>
						<link>http://www.tylerwebsites.com/blogs/index.php/dbs</link>
				<description></description>
				<language>en-US</language>
				<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
				<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=1.8.2"/>
				<ttl>60</ttl>
								<item>
					<title>Consulting Shortfalls</title>
					<link>http://www.tylerwebsites.com/blogs/index.php/dbs/2008/04/26/consulting_shortfalls</link>
					<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 19:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
										<category domain="main">Consulting Commentary</category>					<guid isPermaLink="false">195@http://www.tylerwebsites.com/blogs/</guid>
					<description>Over the years management consultants have been used in employee reductions. That has been the main selling point by many. That has also been the failure of most management consultants and the death of their clients. 

A RIF, or Reductions in Force plan is only one tool of management consultants, although it has been the most used, and the most abused. It has been used to generate quick cash flow for both the client and the consultant. This type of downsizing is addicting, and is rarely a one-time event. In general, I don't believe planned reductions in force will alone put a company on good footing. In many corporations, gradual and continuous downsizing is just one way to go out of business. 

Another abused management tool is outsourcing. Outsourcing is an American idea that it is easier and cheaper to just buy what we need. It is true that you can't always save money by bringing an operation in-house. However, the concept that a company can significantly lower costs by sending part of its work out, suggests that there are some inefficiencies in the company's organization, and those savings may not be within the operation that is being outsourced. Additionally, the company may not be considering the effects that decision has on the company as a whole. This is also a tactic that soon becomes habit-forming.

In some cases, the two are often used together to drop employees from the payroll, and then having them hired back via a new outsource company, often with reduced pay or benefits. That has been the M.O. at UTHSCT for the last 4-6 years. In such cases the outsourcing company may not even be a major provider of the service. This maneuver is characteristic of a dishonest and manipulative company or organization.

The mire of a mismanaged (or unmanaged) company is made up of several layers of bad decisions and incapable managers. The efforts to improve systems quickly with such things as RIFs and outsourcing, often make bad situations worse. The consultants may carefully craft goals that are vague and generalized, not unlike your daily horoscope, when all they are actually doing is improving cash flow, and reducing the size of the operation. I suspect, the consultant may just be the scape-goat for administrative decisions already made.

By collaborating with such companies, management consultants have given the profession a bad image, both with employment, and with companies that are truly in need of a competent consultant. </description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the years management consultants have been used in employee reductions. That has been the main selling point by many. That has also been the failure of most management consultants and the death of their clients. </p>

<p>A RIF, or Reductions in Force plan is only one tool of management consultants, although it has been the most used, and the most abused. It has been used to generate quick cash flow for both the client and the consultant. This type of downsizing is addicting, and is rarely a one-time event. In general, I don't believe planned reductions in force will alone put a company on good footing. In many corporations, gradual and continuous downsizing is just one way to go out of business. </p>

<p>Another abused management tool is outsourcing. Outsourcing is an American idea that it is easier and cheaper to just buy what we need. It is true that you can't always save money by bringing an operation in-house. However, the concept that a company can significantly lower costs by sending part of its work out, suggests that there are some inefficiencies in the company's organization, and those savings may not be within the operation that is being outsourced. Additionally, the company may not be considering the effects that decision has on the company as a whole. This is also a tactic that soon becomes habit-forming.</p>

<p>In some cases, the two are often used together to drop employees from the payroll, and then having them hired back via a new outsource company, often with reduced pay or benefits. That has been the M.O. at <a href="http://www.uthct.edu/">UTHSCT </a>for the last 4-6 years. In such cases the outsourcing company may not even be a major provider of the service. This maneuver is characteristic of a dishonest and manipulative company or organization.</p>

<p>The mire of a mismanaged (or unmanaged) company is made up of several layers of bad decisions and incapable managers. The efforts to improve systems quickly with such things as RIFs and outsourcing, often make bad situations worse. The consultants may carefully craft goals that are vague and generalized, not unlike your daily horoscope, when all they are actually doing is improving cash flow, and reducing the size of the operation. I suspect, the consultant may just be the scape-goat for administrative decisions already made.</p>

<p>By collaborating with such companies, management consultants have given the profession a bad image, both with employment, and with companies that are truly in need of a competent consultant. </p>]]></content:encoded>
					<comments>http://www.tylerwebsites.com/blogs/index.php/dbs?p=195&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1#comments</comments>
				</item>
								<item>
					<title>Diversified Business Services</title>
					<link>http://www.tylerwebsites.com/blogs/index.php/dbs/2008/02/24/diversified_business_services_1</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 01:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
										<category domain="main">Introductions</category>					<guid isPermaLink="false">194@http://www.tylerwebsites.com/blogs/</guid>
					<description>Decades ago I started Diversified Business Services (DBS) and have used that to provide occasional consulting services to small businesses. In most cases I never charged for those services. In that time I have continued to develop expertise in a wide range of services. Since I've also worked full-time elsewhere I didn't get to spend that much time developing DBS as a business. With a potential change in career, I'm focusing on getting DBS to the next step. 

DBS is foremost a management consulting firm. The primary purpose of management consulting, and of DBS is to improve the company's management skills. Problems in company development and profitability are predominantly consequences of lack of management, or mismanagement of the company's resources. Staffing may or may not be reflected by the inadequacies in management. Middle management.

A key component to improving a company's management skills is organizing the company, at every level. In most cases, the improved workflow will enable the company to generate more revenue and profits. 

Things I believe.
</description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Decades ago I started Diversified Business Services (DBS) and have used that to provide occasional consulting services to small businesses. In most cases I never charged for those services. In that time I have continued to develop expertise in a wide range of services. Since I've also worked full-time elsewhere I didn't get to spend that much time developing DBS as a business. With a potential change in career, I'm focusing on getting DBS to the next step. </p>

<p>DBS is foremost a management consulting firm. The primary purpose of management consulting, and of DBS is to improve the company's <strong>management</strong> skills. Problems in company development and profitability are predominantly consequences of lack of management, or mismanagement of the company's resources. Staffing may or may not be reflected by the inadequacies in management. Middle management.</p>

<p>A key component to improving a company's management skills is organizing the company, at every level. In most cases, the improved workflow will enable the company to generate more revenue and profits. </p>

<p>Things I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					<comments>http://www.tylerwebsites.com/blogs/index.php/dbs?p=194&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1#comments</comments>
				</item>
					</channel>
</rss>
